Leasehold enfranchisement
Leasehold enfranchisement, though intricate and multi-faceted, need not be a labyrinth for leaseholders. With expert guidance it can open doors and opportunities. At Forsters, our seasoned team of award-winning lawyers specialise in all aspects of enfranchisement, from lease extensions to complex collective enfranchisements.
Our approach is comprehensive. We guide clients through every step of the process, ensuring clarity and confidence – whether you’re a landlord or tenant, we have a team who can support you. Our involvement in pivotal cases, including Sportelli and Aggio, highlights our expertise. We have the ability to act on large cases, whilst also addressing discrete matters that demand specialised advice.
Our client roster includes prestigious Central London estates such as The Phillimore Estate, The Crown Estate, The Corporation of Trinity House, The Stanhope Estate, and The Mexborough Estate. We are equally committed to leaseholders of flats and houses, whether they be individuals, groups, companies, or investors.
Beyond legalities, we advise on how enfranchisement impacts investment and development opportunities, which is especially crucial for mixed-use properties. We strive to ensure our insights empower you to make informed decisions.
Forsters are dedicated to remaining at the forefront of change in this sector, which has seen the passing of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024. See what’s changed and what’s coming up on our timeline below.
Download our handy interactive flowcharts
Complete the form below to access our helpful interactive flowcharts to guide you through the legal steps for flat lease extensions, right to manage, right to acquire freehold of house and collective enfranchisement matters.
Leasehold reform timeline
Delayed
Consultation on capitalisation rate and deferment rate delayed pending conclusion of Human Rights Challenge
Delayed
Primary legislation (amending errors in LAFRA) and secondary legislation to commence LAFRA (including rates)
15 – 18 July 2025
Substantive hearing for Human Rights Challenge at Royal Courts of Justice
31 January 2025
Two-year ownership rule for lease extensions and freehold claims removed
7 January 2021
Sweeping leasehold reforms announced by Housing Secretary
18 March 2019
Report on leasehold reform published by House of Commons Committee
20 September 2018
Law Commission’s consultation on leasehold enfranchisement reform launched
14 December 2017
Law Commission’s 13th Programme of Law Reform published
Track record
Aggio
We acted for Mr Aggio, the representative of the head tenant of a building on the Howard de Walden Estate, in relation to two claims for statutory lease extensions of flats included within the head lease but not separately underlet. The landlord disputed the claims on the basis that the head tenant was not a qualifying tenant. On appeal to the House of Lords, it was successfully held that the tenant of a lease of property that includes a flat, can be the tenant of that flat for the purposes of a statutory lease extension claim, regardless of the nature or extent of the other property included in the demise. These are now commonly referred to as “Aggio” lease extensions.
Wyatts Almhouses
We acted for the landlord in a 1967 Act claim relating to 32 houses which relied on the Aggio decision. The matter involved consideration of development value and careful thought and negotiation on the terms of the transfer to achieve the best deal for the landlord.
Lawrence Wharf Freehold Limited
We acted for the tenants in a complex collective enfranchisement claim involving six blocks in an estate comprising 160 flats. This matter progressed to a hotly contested six day Tribunal hearing where capitalisation rates and development hope value were determined. The decision is a useful reminder of the importance in valuation of obtaining comparables and not relying on previous decisions.
Aldford House Freehold Limited
We acted for the tenants of a building in Park Lane, Aldford House, in relation to a complex collective enfranchisement claim. The right to make the claim was disputed by the freeholder and the head landlord on various grounds. The Court of Appeal determined the definition of a “Flat” under the 1993 Act in the tenants favour and the Supreme Court refused permission to appeal that decision. The matter is now proceeding to the Tribunal for determination of terms and premium and the dispute will involve complicated valuation issues, including potential development hope value and issues in relation to the extent of the head lease that is acquirable under the Act.
Sportelli
We acted for the tenants of a flat in Cadogan Square, Mr and Mrs Sportelli, which resulted in a landmark decision of the House of Lords – setting deferment rates for houses and flats in enfranchisement cases throughout the country.
Rent review arbitrations
We advised on valuation issues arising out of the 1967 Act and 1993 Act in long running multistage rent review arbitration in relation to an £8 billion property portfolio, which resulted in two separate 14 day hearings, each involving extensive cross-examination of expert witnesses.
Meet our team
Natasha Rees
Senior Partner
Lucy Barber
Partner, Head of Residential Property
Lucy Zaremba
Counsel, Real Estate Disputes
Caroline Wild
Counsel, Real Estate Disputes
Freddie Hunter
Senior Associate, Residential Property
James Carpenter
Senior Associate, Real Estate Disputes
Samantha Tomczyk
Senior Associate, Residential Property
Lauren Spark
Senior Associate, Real Estate Disputes
Jeanette Harris
Paralegal, Real Estate Disputes
News and views
Government to cap ground rents: what you need to know
Landlords lose legal challenge to Leasehold Reform Act
An update on the human rights challenges made against LAFRA…
