19 July 2018

Jo Edwards quoted in The Times on latest spousal maintenance ruling

On 18 July, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Mills v Mills, dealing with spousal maintenance and the circumstances in which a recipient can come back many years after divorce to ask for an increase.  The Supreme Court found that it wouldn’t ordinarily be right to order increased spousal maintenance to cover a need already covered by the original order, e.g. housing costs.

The Times quoted Jo Edwards, Head of Family, who said that this may be considered to be a “pyrrhic victory” for Mr Mills, who started this process wanting a reduction in or termination of his obligations.  In recent years, there has been a significant shift towards spousal maintenance being ordered for a fixed term, rather than for life.  The Family Justice Council, Law Commission and House of Lords have all endorsed an approach that ‘allows a transition to independence’. However, it is important to note that this will not be right in every case.

A link to The Times article can be found here (subscription required).

Our Insights

“High levels of capability and diligence, coupled with an ability to empathise with our situation and make genuine recommendations as opposed to simply presenting options.”
The Legal 500, 2024