The importance of scoping a workplace investigation

A guide to conducting workplace investigations

Contact us

Old fashioned stop watch

Chapter three: The importance of scoping a workplace investigation

One of the most critical (and often overlooked) steps in the workplace investigation process is to define the scope of the investigation.

A well-scoped investigation sets clear boundaries and expectations, clarifies objectives, and ensures fairness and efficiency. Failing to define the scope properly can lead to misunderstandings, delays, missed issues and ultimately outcomes that may be challenged or create difficulties in the subsequent stages of the process.

 

How to scope an investigation:

Set out the purpose of the investigation and the role of the investigator

The primary aim of a scoping exercise is to establish what the investigation is (and is not) intended to achieve. Investigators need a clear mandate, for example they need to know whether they are:

  • simply fact-finding
  • expected to make recommendations
  • determining whether there is a case to answer under a specific policy
  • expected to decide whether issues should be upheld or not at the end of the investigation.

If any decision is to be made by the investigator, the relevant burden of proof should also be clear.

Without this clarity about the remit and limitation of the investigation, investigators can veer off course, expanding beyond the initial complaint or miss key issues entirely. A clearly articulated scope helps ensure that the investigation stays focused and that expectations are met.

Defining the scope of an investigation should also include clarifying the roles of everyone involved in the process. This includes:

  • the role of HR and the extent to which they will provide oversight and support
  • whether any specialist or expert assistance is required (for example, from an IT forensics or medical professional)
  • the individuals involved (complainant, respondent, witnesses), who need to know what the investigation will cover and how it will affect them.  Having a clear scope can also help to identify the witnesses who are likely to be able to provide helpful evidence relevant to each issue.

When roles and boundaries are unclear, it can lead to procedural challenges and could compromise the overall credibility of the investigation.

Key steps to scoping a workplace investigation:

  • 1.

    Start with the complaint or concern

    Understand the specific issues being raised and identify the relevant policies or procedures.

  • 2.

    Define the terms of reference

    Outline what is being investigated, what is outside the scope, the timeframe of events under review, and who the key parties are.

  • 3.

    Set clear objectives

    Clarify whether the investigation is to determine facts, assess whether policy was breached, to decide whether concerns should be upheld or not and/or to inform future action.

  • 4.

    Document everything

    Maintain a written record of the agreed scope and share it with relevant individuals.

  • 5.

    Review and adjust if needed

    If new information arises, revisit the scope to determine whether it needs to be amended and properly document the reasons for any changes.

Why it matters:

Minimise errors and create trust

Poorly scoped investigations increase the risk of procedural errors, which can result in allegations of unfairness and a breakdown in employee trust. For example, without a robust scope, investigators may find themselves:

  • investigating issues that fall outside the relevant policy and procedure
  • failing to correctly identify the relevant issues or interrogate evidence properly
  • making findings or recommendations that go beyond the investigator’s remit and compromise the subsequent stages in the process.

A clearly defined scope helps to avoid these pitfalls and ensures the investigation is clear, proportionate and focused.

Employees are more likely to engage with and trust the investigation process when they understand what is being investigated and why. Providing a clear outline of the scope at the start of the process reassures all parties that:

  • the process is fair and objective
  • personal information will only be used as necessary
  • The investigation will not be used as a fishing expedition

Transparency about scope fosters confidence in the integrity of the process and helps manage expectations around outcomes.

Workplace investigations can quickly become a drain on organisational resources – consuming valuable time, escalating costs, and diverting attention from core business priorities. This is especially true when investigations are poorly scoped, leading to unnecessary interviews, irrelevant lines of inquiry, and procedural delays.

In summary

Setting out a clear scope and framework at the outset of a workplace investigation ensures the process is transparent, focussed and resources are well managed.

Particular attention should be given to:

  • Defining the specific allegations or issues under review

  • The format in which findings should be presented

  • Whether the investigator is expected to make any recommendations to the decision maker

  • All individuals involved understand their role and remit

However, investigations are dynamic by nature, and the scope or framework may need to be revisited and updated as new information emerges.

Chapter four: Confidentiality as a cornerstone

Failing to be mindful of confidentiality during the investigation process can breed a host of thorny practical problems.

Read chapter four

A letter sealed with wax and stamped