A landlord’s guide to tenant administration

Blueprint displaying a detailed architectural floor plan, showcasing rooms, corridors, and spiral staircases. Grids and lines indicate measurements and sections. Text includes numbers and labels like "SALON."

Administration is a “rescue” procedure, where the primary statutory objective is to allow a company to carry on trading as a going concern. In practice, most administrations do not achieve this objective and result in a sale of certain assets and the liquidation of the remainder – the original company rarely survives.

Administration works by imposing a moratorium on legal action against the company by creditors: thus allowing the company breathing space to reorganise its affairs. Once appointed, administrators will have the power to deal with the company’s property and assets. They will often sell off parts of the business to third parties, and may grant third parties the right to occupy the premises.

Will Rent Be Paid?

If the administrators continue to use the premises for the purposes of the administration – for example, by trading from it or allowing others to trade from it – then they will be liable to pay the rent and other sums due under the lease in respect of that period as an expense of the administration. This means the sums are payable as a priority, before sums owing to the majority of creditors. They will be payable at a daily rate, for the period that the administrators use the property. Rent paid as an expense is typically paid monthly in arrears, even though the lease might state otherwise (e.g. quarterly in advance).

Rent and other sums which have fallen due for payment in respect of a period either before the administrators are appointed, or once they have stopped using the premises, are unlikely to be paid immediately or in full.

What is the Effect on any Guarantee or Other Security?

The administration of a tenant will not have any impact on a guarantee given by a third party company or individual, unless there are specific provisions governing this in the guarantee agreement. We recommend that you check the terms of any guarantee as soon as you can, and ensure that you understand what steps need to be taken in order to make a claim from the guarantor. If the guarantee is in the form of an authorised guarantee agreement (“AGA”) given by a former tenant, or the guarantor of a former tenant, you will need to serve notice (under s17 of the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995) on the guarantor within 6 months of the sums falling due. This time limit is strict, and the right to recovery will be lost if it is not met.

The impact of the administration on any rent deposit will depend on how the rent deposit deed has been drafted, and how the deposit is held. Again, we recommend that you check the terms of the rent deposit deed as soon as possible, and ensure you understand what needs to be done in order to withdraw sums. It is usually possible to withdraw sums to settle any outstanding liabilities of the tenant under the lease. The administrators’ prior consent for this is often required, and is usually given.

Can the Administrators Bring the Lease to an End Without My Consent?

No. Unlike some other insolvency procedures such as liquidation, administrators do not have the power to disclaim leases.

If the administrators do not want to use the premises you may find you are offered a surrender early on. Administrators will often ask for a complete release of liability under the lease upon surrender. You should consider any such offer very carefully, since accepting it may bring forward your liability for business rates or limit your ability to recover unpaid arrears or claim for dilapidations.

You should also be careful of any attempts by the administrators to return keys to the property, as this may give effect to a surrender by operation of law if accepted by the landlord (or its agents). If keys are returned, then it should be made clear that they are being held on the tenant’s behalf for collection.

Can I Terminate the Lease and Re-Let the Premises?

Any surrender of the lease requires the agreement of both parties, in the usual way.

Whilst a tenant is in administration, the usual position is that a landlord may not forfeit the lease without either the consent of the administrators or the permission of the Court. A landlord may request the administrators’ consent to forfeit. If the administrators refuse, their reasoning should be examined carefully- the Court may take a different view.

If a landlord considers it likely that a tenant may shortly enter administration, it may wish to consider forfeiting the lease at an earlier stage and before these protections come into effect (assuming of course that the landlord has grounds to do so).

There is a Third Party In Occupation: What Are My Rights?

Administrators often let third parties into occupation of premises- often in breach of the terms of the lease! This is usually done as part of a sale of the company’s assets, by which the administrators permit the purchaser to occupy pursuant to a licence pending a formal application for landlord’s consent to assign. While the moratorium makes it harder to take action against the administrators, such action will usually be a breach of the tenant’s covenant not to assign without consent and the usual rules and the provisions of lease will apply to any subsequent application for consent that is made. You should check your rights under the lease carefully as this may be an opportunity to insist on the provision of additional security for the new tenant’s covenants and/or payment of any arrears as a condition of the assignment – most modern leases will contain provisions that entitle the landlord invoke such conditions.

When dealing with such applications, it is worth remembering that the landlord’s duties under the lease and statute are owed to the tenant, not the proposed assignee.

If your preferred course is to recover the premises, it may be possible to pursue a forfeiture strategy based on the breach of the tenant’s covenants but this will require the court’s permission if the administrators will not consent to it. It may not be possible to convince the Court to grant consent to forfeit where the occupation of the premises by the third party is helping to achieve the aims of the administration, and rent is being paid.

How Do I Get the Court’s Permission to Forfeit or Enforce the Adminstrators’ Duty To Pay Rent?

The administration will be listed in the High Court and, like most creditors, landlords can make applications in the administration for the Court to determine. These applications are governed by the insolvency legislation, so the Court will consider your application in the context of the whole administration process and, if successful, its impact on other creditors. These additional considerations can sometimes see one creditor’s rights not enforced even though there appear to be clear grounds for doing so on a purely contractual level. That said, many applications can and do succeed, so it is important to take stock early and execute any strategy with the benefit of expert advice.

A woman smiles, wearing a white blouse and pearl necklace, with medium-length auburn hair, set against a blurred, neutral background. No text is present.
Author

Charlotte Ross

View profile

Financing Biodiversity Net Gain requirements – who pays? Sophie Smith shares her thoughts with Sustain

A close-up of a large green leaf, displaying prominent parallel veins, creating a textured pattern across its surface. The image focuses on natural detail, emphasising organic structure.

Best practice is yet to emerge on how responsibility and cost for compliance with biodiversity net gain (BNG) planning requirements in England will be split between developers, landlords and occupiers. In this article, Sophie Smith, an associate at law firm Forsters, discusses how to lessen the likelihood of disputes between these parties and whether BNG considerations are likely to slow an already sluggish planning system.

BNG aims to leave the biodiversity position of development sites in a measurably better state than before the development was carried out, maintained over a 30-year period. Developments are required to deliver a 10% increase in biodiversity value relative to the pre-development value of the onsite habitat.

Achieving this comes with costs which landowners must factor into the price paid for development sites at the outset. Depending on whether the net gain is provided on-site, off-site, via the purchase of statutory creds, or as a combination, BNG compliance costs arise differently.

For on-site delivery, in addition to the initial cost during development, ongoing maintenance costs throughout the 30-year period will arise. Depending on the nature of the site and at what stage the landlord-tenant relationship arises, these costs could be recovered via service charge. From a landlord perspective, the leasehold allocation of responsibility for BNG should be considered from a future onward sale or funding perspective. Traditionally, landlords have expected a “clean” rent and there is no reason why that could not capture maintenance of on-site, and off-site mitigation. We expect landlords will take a robust position on this, but whether the market will accept that remains to be seen.

Responsibility for maintaining BNG for the requisite 30-year long period will bind successor interests in the site. Where the on-site gain is secured by a s106 agreement, depending on how the s106 is drafted, it could relieve occupiers from responsibility for maintaining onsite BNG. This is distinct from any leasehold covenant of the tenant to be responsible for BNG and apportioning financial and/or active maintenance responsibility for BNG amongst a multi-let estate. Factors to consider include where the relevant mitigation is located within the site and the level of maintenance required to protect the net gain. Careful consideration will be required as to the initial delivery of BNG and separately its ongoing maintenance, particularly in terms of phased planning permissions.

Whilst BNG mitigation is a hierarchical system, with the onus being on on-site delivery in the first instance, an alternative option is to deliver the required BNG by securing off-site units. Whilst this could be expensive for landlords in terms of upfront costs, off-site BNG delivery gives developers more freedom on-site resulting in neater solutions.

A last resort is the purchase of statutory biodiversity credits from the Government, which are invested in habitat creation in England. Depending on the distinctiveness of the habitat, a measure based on the type of habitat and its distinguishing features, such credits can cost anywhere between £42,000 per unit rising to a maximum of £650,000 per unit for the highest value water environments. These costs can be more than ten times the price of delivering on site, according to CBRE, making them significant for developers.

Advance planning, from both landlords and tenants, is crucial to successfully financing and complying with these planning requirements. Equally, additional time should be factored into developments owing to a lack of resource at local authority level, which may cause delays both in obtaining planning permission and discharging the associated pre-commencement condition.

This article was published on Sustain on 07 August and can be read here.

Sophie Smith
Author

Sophie Smith

View profile

EPC Conversion Factors – Guidance Note

A row of modern townhouses features large glass doors and brick façades. The buildings have balconies above the ground floor, and the symmetrical design is set in a suburban environment.

In June 2022, there were updates to the EPC calculation methodology, that are typically seeing worsening of EPCs that use gas and do not comply with the latest building regulations. Typically, non-domestic properties of this type have experienced a 1-grade drop.

Landlord building implications

Was your EPC lodged prior to June 2022? Does your property use gas?

If your property falls into both of the above categories, your current EPC was calculated using the old methodology, at renewal of EPC, you may be at risk of a worse EPC score or rating, even if you have completed improvement works. Depending on the property, a worse EPC may negatively impact:

  • Tenancy contracts/green lease clauses
  • Existing funding or investment agreements (if clauses are linked to the EPC rating)
  • Current Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards, if you are currently close to a D or E rating.

To understand the potential implications to your EPC, it may be time to commission a new EPC assessment (this does not necessarily need to be lodged if your current EPC is still valid), to enable accurate forward planning if issues arise.

Landlord lease implications – new leases and tenant alterations

It is now commonplace for commercial tenants to be under an obligation for their alterations to not negatively impact the EPC rating. The concern for tenants arises where works have been carried out since the EPC was initially lodged (prior to June 2022). Upon completion of the works (if these works necessitate a new EPC), there is a significant risk that the overall EPC rating could come down. Tenants may face challenges proving that the completed works are not the cause of the downgraded EPC rating, which could complicate their position.

Actions going forward – mutual benefit/clarity

To provide clarity for both landlords and tenants on the current position of the building where:

  • The EPC was lodged prior to June 2022
  • Gas is used at the property.

Consider commissioning a new EPC assessment (as previously mentioned this does not necessarily need to be lodged if your current EPC is still valid). This can then be used to evidence a correct baseline which ensures clarity for both a landlord and tenant on the EPC rating of the property (allowing the tenant to accurately assess the impact of any alterations they may be planning) and gives the landlord an ability to plan what future investment will be required to ensure they continue to have a good and marketable asset well into the future.

A smiling man, wearing a white button-up shirt and dark blazer, faces forward in front of a neutral, blurred background. There is no text in the image.
Author

Colin Brown

View profile

Understanding Biodiversity Net Gain: part two – landowners

A close-up of a large green leaf, displaying prominent parallel veins, creating a textured pattern across its surface. The image focuses on natural detail, emphasising organic structure.

With many environmental factors and new green legislation for the real estate industry to consider, we continue to focus on Biodiversity Net Gain in the second of our two-part special.

In part one, we discussed Biodiversity Net Gain obligations imposed by the Environment Act 2021 through the lens of developers; today in part two, we focus on landowners. Alongside Polly Montoneri, Partner in our Rural Land and Business team, and Planning Associate, Sophie Smith, we talk about the impacts of Biodiversity Net Gain obligations and the challenges landowners are faced with.

Read more about Real Estate Sustainability here.


In this episode:

Previous episode:

Listen to more episodes and subscribe

You can listen to more episodes of the More Than Law podcast here on our website, as well as subscribe on your favourite podcast services, including SoundCloud iTunes/Apple Podcasts, Spotify

To continue the conversation on social media, use #MoreThanLawPodcast

A woman with curly hair smiles, wearing a black top and necklace, set against a softly blurred, neutral background.
Author

Louise Irvine

View profile

Understanding Biodiversity Net Gain: part one – developers

A row of modern townhouses features large glass doors and brick façades. The buildings have balconies above the ground floor, and the symmetrical design is set in a suburban environment.

As we progress towards a greener future, the real estate industry faces many changes and new challenges.

Today, we dive into the first of a two-part special that looks closely at wildlife and its new place in the planning system.

Hosted by Senior Knowledge Development Lawyer, Louise Irvine, we take a look at Biodiversity Net Gain with Charlie Croft, Senior Associate in Forsters’ Commercial Real Estate team, and Sophie Smith, Associate in our Planning team. Together, we look at the Biodiversity Net Gain requirements outlined in the planning process, and how these obligations will impact developers.

Listen to Understanding Biodiversity Net Gain: part two – landowners

Read more about Real Estate Sustainability here.


In this episode:

Listen to more episodes and subscribe

You can listen to more episodes of the More Than Law podcast here on our website, as well as subscribe on your favourite podcast services, including SoundCloud iTunes/Apple Podcasts, Spotify

To continue the conversation on social media, use #MoreThanLawPodcast

A woman with curly hair smiles, wearing a black top and necklace, set against a softly blurred, neutral background.
Author

Louise Irvine

View profile

Commitment to Sustainability: Forsters and Kelly Noel-Smith shortlisted for industry awards

Two blurred figures walk in an office, featuring a circular staircase and modern furniture. Glass walls partition a conference room, enhancing the open, contemporary workspace design.

Forsters LLP and CSR Partner, Kelly Noel-Smith, have been shortlisted in The Legal 500 ESG and LexisNexis Legal Awards 2024.

LexisNexis Legal Awards: Award for Sustainability – Forsters

Since our inception in 1998, Forsters has pioneered its approach to sustainability, and we are proud to see this commitment recognised.

This year has seen our most ambitious commitments to date.

In 2021, we signed up to a science-based emission reduction target to halve our greenhouse gas emissions by 2030. We were one of the first firms of our size to make this pledge. In Autumn 2023 our reduction target was approved by the Science Based Target initiative.

We have a rigorous best practice programme in place driven by significant external commitments and characterised by a thoroughness of approach both internally and in how we support our clients and wider stakeholders.

The LexisNexis Legal Awards celebrate groundbreaking contributions to the legal industry. The winners will be announced on 14 March.

The Legal 500 ESG Awards: Environmental/Sustainability: Private Practice Champion of the year (internal) – Kelly Noel-Smith

We are delighted to announce that Kelly has been recognised for leading our approach to sustainability and establishing Forsters’ best practice programme.

Kelly has been an integral driver of change, which has included:

  • Building a CSR team
  • Creating our Green Impact Group
  • Spearheading our 2021 commitment to a science-based emission reduction target
  • Creating and leading our Sustainability Board
  • Establishing our Sustainability Hub in 2020
  • Initiating a Sustainability Collaborations programme with clients and intermediaries to consolidate sustainable ways of working operationally.

The inaugural Legal 500 ESG UK Awards will celebrate the very best ESG initiatives across the UK legal market. The winners will be announced on 24 April.

A person with short, white hair smiles softly, wearing a light-coloured blazer and a pearl necklace, set against a blurred, ribbed glass background.
Author

Kelly Noel-Smith

View profile

The Sector Race to Net Zero – a fund level perspective

A close-up of a large green leaf, displaying prominent parallel veins, creating a textured pattern across its surface. The image focuses on natural detail, emphasising organic structure.

We all recognise the real estate industry is shifting towards net zero, but where are the different sectors at on their journey?

In the second of our Race to Net Zero podcast series we set out to explore this question, taking a fund level perspective with Ben Lonsdale, Director of ESG at Patrizia, and Edward Glass, Senior Associate in Forsters’ Commercial Real Estate team. Together, we delve into the different decarbonisation pathways parties are considering, discuss whether green regulation can help drive change, and understand the importance of the S in ESG.

Read more about Real Estate Sustainability here.

In this episode:

  • Louise Irvine – Senior Knowledge Development Lawyer, Commercial Real Estate
  • Edward Glass – Senior Associate, Commercial Real Estate
  • Ben Lonsdale – Director of ESG, Patrizia

Previous episode

Listen to more episodes and subscribe

You can listen to more episodes of the More Than Law podcast here on our website, as well as subscribe on your favourite podcast services, including SoundCloud iTunes/Apple Podcasts, Spotify

To continue the conversation on social media, use #MoreThanLawPodcast

A man is smiling directly at the camera, wearing a grey suit and light blue shirt, with a plain background.
Author

Edward Glass

View profile

Connected thinking on rooftop solar – Victoria Towers writes for EG

Rooftop Solar

Victoria Towers, Partner and Co-Head of Industrial and Logistics, has written a piece for EG on the benefits of collective thinking to streamline the legal processes causing delay to rooftop solar.

With time running out for promised legislative change to facilitate rooftop solar, there is much to be achieved in banging a few heads together and streamlining some of the legal processes currently causing delays.

The issue is acute for power-hungry industrial and logistics development, when rooftop solar is often incorporated as part of any planning application and the market is clamouring for fast delivery of new space in the right locations.

It was October, in energy secretary Claire Coutinho’s speech to the Conservative Party conference, promising to reduce red tape for solar panels on industrial rooftops, that she bemoaned solar farms covering our green and pleasant land, and pledged to make it easier for solar panels to be installed on industrial rooftops, warehouses, car parks and factories, cutting through the planning red tape that limits the amount of solar that businesses can currently install.

At the same time, her department’s Solar Taskforce has been looking at barriers to rooftop solar after highlighting the untapped potential of commercial sites, such as warehouses. The task force is due to be wound up around February, and its work will be used for a solar roadmap, to be published later this year.

This time last year, a survey by Forsters found 77% of developers and investors currently used solar panels on industrial and logistics real estate or planned to. The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero should be pushing at an open door.

The government’s own figures show progress in getting photovoltaics on to buildings. An update published in January showed that 50% of capacity came from ground-mounted or stand-alone solar installations at the end of September 2023, but – rather perversely – the majority of the remaining capacity was on domestic buildings, not commercial.

November’s Autumn Statement addressed the issue, promising reform of the grid connection process to cut waiting times, including freeing up more than 100GW of capacity so that renewable energy projects can connect sooner, potentially reducing connection delays from five years to no more than six months.

Co-operation is key

For those of us negotiating these connections for industrial developments, day in and day out, investment is certainly needed. Not only in the grid infrastructure itself but also – much like the challenges around the planning process – in the process of securing a connection. Client projects seem to be held to ransom on substation and wayleave arrangements when they want to connect to the grid.

A question often presents itself when repeatedly agreeing substation leases with providers: why, when dealing again with the same provider, can we not cut through the negotiation and proceed on similar terms? There are a handful of points that are site-specific, but the usual obligations around repair, alterations, use and works in the vicinity of any cabling do not need to be brokered every time. Surely it is better for all those concerned to ensure that the legal documentation is progressed as swiftly and efficiently as possible.

To that end, it does not seem beyond contemplation to have a common ground as a starting point – but standard terms will only work if drafted well. A few years ago, a template wayleave agreement was introduced, but the result was too complicated and everyone quickly broke away from the standard approach. As the pressure increases on all those involved, it seems that we should look at agreeing a succinct, market-appropriate suite of documents that can be called on.

We know that most substation providers have a list of requirements – for example, uncapped indemnities – but many of these are unrealistic and deter investment. Investors don’t like indemnities where they are unnecessary, and quite often facts can allay the concerns that providers have. For instance, an indemnity should not be required on a site that is verified as remediated from an environmental perspective.

Mindset shift

Another frustration comes in the interplay between utility companies. If a gas pipe and an electricity cable are both needed, we would expect some joined-up thinking in using the same route and consulting with each other over installation.

We need more co-operation between independent distribution network operators and distribution network operators. We find ourselves in situations, albeit rare, where we are only permitted to liaise with the IDNO, which in turn has to pick up with the DNO. Alternatively – and again rather confusingly – we liaise with each entity but they do not have any contact with each other. This makes negotiations more protracted and challenging.

There is an interesting legal question here as to whether a potential power user has a right to be connected to the grid. We know the regulatory backdrop, but more and more we are being presented with a “take it or leave it” attitude to negotiations, where the view seems to be that if the end user does not agree to the terms, then the relevant development can be left without power. How has it come to this?

An attitude shift and greater uniformity should not require test cases or legislation. Instead, there should be a focus on working together, taking a sensible approach and not reinventing the wheel every time negotiations are commenced. Strict timelines, set in legislation, would focus minds, but it is hard to imagine a sanction that would not make the situation worse by drawing resources away from investment in grid infrastructure.

Developers are incurring huge costs as a result of delays in getting substations built, signed off and energised. Industrial and logistics development needs to be quick to meet demand – and we need the providers to be more responsive and more reasonable.

The article was originally published on 27 February 2024 and can be read here behind the paywall.

Victoria Towers
Author

Victoria Towers

View profile

Biodiversity Net Gain obligations

A row of modern townhouses features large glass doors and brick façades. The buildings have balconies above the ground floor, and the symmetrical design is set in a suburban environment.

BNG planning obligations came into effect on 12 February 2024. This means that for most developments, any planning application submitted from this date will be subject to the BNG requirements. Any existing permissions, or applications pending at this date, are not affected.

The obligations are onerous and developers will need specific guidance. Forsters’ planning experts can offer guidance and practical advice on how to navigate the BNG requirements.

Read our introductory briefing note

Read our follow-up briefing note from February 2024

Further guidance and practical examples will be circulated when available.

For more information, get in touch with our Planning team to discuss how we can help.

Kelly Noel-Smith shortlisted in The Legal500 ESG UK Awards – Environmental/Sustainable Champion Award

Two blurred figures walk in an office, featuring a circular staircase and modern furniture. Glass walls partition a conference room, enhancing the open, contemporary workspace design.

We are delighted to share that CSR Partner, Kelly Noel-Smith, has been shortlisted in The Legal500 ESG UK Awards – Environmental/Sustainability Champion.

The award acknowledges truly exceptional individual contributions to improving sustainability in private practice over the last year, with a focus on internal initiatives at law firms.

Since joining the firm as a Partner in 2009, Kelly Noel-Smith has pioneered our approach to sustainability, developing and leading our best practice programme. Kelly spearheaded Forsters’ 2021 commitment to a science-based emission reduction target to halve our greenhouse gas emissions by 2030. We were one of the first firms of our size to make this pledge. In Autumn 2023 our reduction target was approved by the Science Based Target initiative.

The winner of the award will be announced on 24 April.

We are also delighted that Forsters has been shortlisted for the Lexis Nexis Legal Awards 2024 – Award for Sustainability. Winners will be announced on 14 March.

A person with short, white hair smiles softly, wearing a light-coloured blazer and a pearl necklace, set against a blurred, ribbed glass background.
Author

Kelly Noel-Smith

View profile

Navigating the Evolving Landscape of Energy Efficiency Regulations in Real Estate

A row of modern townhouses features large glass doors and brick façades. The buildings have balconies above the ground floor, and the symmetrical design is set in a suburban environment.

Listen in as we uncover the intricacies of global real estate decisions impacted by changing regulations with Edward Glass.

We explore critical topics such as minimum energy efficiency standards, energy performance certificates, and the rise of green lease clauses. Edward has been tracking the E in ESG closely since 2013-14, and his expertise shines as he discusses the change in the industry that EPC regulations have instigated and how Forsters is dedicated to sustainability.

We venture further into the financial implications of current and future regulations on real estate investments, emphasising the potential costs and risks for asset owners. We tackle the important question of how landlords should approach energy performance certificates, particularly with the looming necessity of capital expenditure to upgrade buildings to comply with future regulations. Listen in as we analyse the proposed uplift in minimum energy standards, its potential impact on the UK real estate, and strategies for budgeting for OPEX costs.

The episode concludes with an insightful look into the changing landscape of green lease clauses, data sharing, and its enforceability. Edward shares his observations on the evolving narrative for both landlords and tenants and key considerations when drafting leases. We discuss innovative approaches like the Chancery Lane Project, the challenges of enforcing sustainability clauses in the commercial sector, and the importance of a strong landlord-tenant relationship in the residential sector. So, tune in and equip yourself with knowledge about the changing regulations in real estate, whether you are a landlord, tenant, or investor.

  • Energy Efficiency Standards and Green Lease
  • Implications of Energy Performance Certificates
  • Changing Green Lease Clauses Landscape
  • Green Lease Clauses and Data Sharing


This podcast was recorded and first published by LifeProven. Read more here.

A man is smiling directly at the camera, wearing a grey suit and light blue shirt, with a plain background.
Author

Edward Glass

View profile

The Sector Race to Net Zero – a cross-sector regulatory perspective

A row of modern townhouses features large glass doors and brick façades. The buildings have balconies above the ground floor, and the symmetrical design is set in a suburban environment.

As the real estate industry transitions towards a net zero world, where are the different sectors on that journey?

As we move into 2024 and an Olympic year, Forsters are set to explore that question, looking at how the sectors are embracing the net zero challenge. In our first podcast, we take a cross-sector approach in conversation with Rob Wall, Assistant Director of Sustainability and Tax Policy at the British Property Federation. What is the state of play in terms of regulation?

Read more about Real Estate Sustainability here.


In this episode:

  • Louise Irvine – Commercial Real Estate Senior Knowledge Development Lawyer
  • Rob Wall – Assistant Director of Sustainability and Tax Policy at the British Property Federation

Listen to more episodes and subscribe

You can listen to more episodes of the More Than Law podcast here on our website, as well as subscribe on your favourite podcast services, including SoundCloud iTunes/Apple Podcasts, Spotify

To continue the conversation on social media, use #MoreThanLawPodcast

A woman with curly hair smiles, wearing a black top and necklace, set against a softly blurred, neutral background.
Author

Louise Irvine

View profile

Outside the Box – Episode 3 – ESG-volution

A vast, empty warehouse features polished floors and high ceilings. Bright overhead lights illuminate the spacious interior, which includes stacked pallets and shelving on the right side.

In the third episode of our Outside the Box podcast, we look at sustainability in the Industrial and Logistics sector.  Miri Stickland, Forsters’ Head of Knowledge is joined by Victoria Towers, Partner at Forsters and Co-Head of Industrial and Logistics, and Jessica Pilz, Head of Sustainable Investing, Private Markets at Fiera Capital.  

With the sector committed to meeting net zero targets by 2050, UK investors and developers have highlighted the need for further assistance from Government. We discuss how recent announcements from Rishi Sunak weakening net zero policies will impact the sector, how pressure is mounting and where meaningful gains can be made. 

Read more about ESG and the I&L sector in Forsters’ report from Spring 2023:  Outside the Box – Supporting an Industrial Evolution.

Contact our team

 

In this episode

  • Victoria Towers, Partner and Co-Head of Industrial and Logistics
  • Jessica Pilz, Head of Sustainable Investing, Private Markets at Fiera Capital

 

You may also be interested in

 

Previous episodes:

 

Listen to more episodes and subscribe

You can listen to more episodes of the More Than Law podcast here on our website, as well as subscribe on your favourite podcast services, including SoundCloud iTunes/Apple Podcasts Spotify

To continue the conversation on social media, use #MoreThanLawPodcast

Victoria Towers
Author

Victoria Towers

View profile

Developers get ready for BNG – Sophie Smith quoted in Property Week

A row of modern townhouses features large glass doors and brick façades. The buildings have balconies above the ground floor, and the symmetrical design is set in a suburban environment.

Planning Associate, Sophie Smith, has been quoted in Property Week’s latest piece addressing biodiversity net gain (BNG) and the November deadline for developers.

From November, developers in England will have to ensure any projects they undertake produce a BNG of at least 10% – and put a plan in place to ensure the gain is maintained for 30 years or more.

Property Week highlighted that some developers will already have experience dealing with this as some councils have implemented such policies in local plans. However, for many others, BNG will be entirely new.

Sophie Smith shared her thoughts on the new guidance acknowledging that it does seem to indicate that the Government is ‘moving in the right direction’ to meet the November target but notes that there are still significant gaps in the regulation and that time is running out.

She goes on to comment “There are still fairly material points that remain to be dealt with via secondary legislation, particularly, for example, in relation to outline schemes or phased developments.”

“Where this information is not clear and local planning authorities are not prepared in advance for the requirements, this will inevitably lead to confusion in the planning system from all sides and delays to applications being progressed.”

“This will particularly be the case if the November target remains and the legislation is published fairly last minute.”

This article was first published in Property Week on 24 August 2023 and is available to read in full here, behind their paywall.

Sophie Smith
Author

Sophie Smith

View profile

Progress on energy use is essential – Edward Glass responds to Property Week Editor

A row of modern townhouses features large glass doors and brick façades. The buildings have balconies above the ground floor, and the symmetrical design is set in a suburban environment.

Commercial Real Estate Senior Associate and member of our Sustainability group, Edward Glass, has written to the Editor of Property Week, Lem Bingley, agreeing with his latest leader column that the Climate Change Committee’s negative assessment of progress in decarbonising buildings is deeply worrying.

Glass says: “We need to see progress on the ground, where it really counts. Regulation has a role to play here and the Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards (MEES) regime, in which it is now unlawful to continue to let a commercial property with an ‘F’ or ‘G’ Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) rating (subject to exemptions), has focused attention.

“However, as the report identifies, we have not seen progress on occupational energy ratings or regulatory certainty on anticipated uplifts to MEES thresholds.

“Many are calling for mandatory disclosures on an annual basis, using the updated NABERS 2.0 rating, potentially with fiscal incentives resulting from achieving a top score. Surely this is the next logical legislative step to drive actual change on the ground. The relevant government consultation seems to be on the backburner and while the report identifies this, a response is not a key priority recommendation, in contrast to that on the ‘EPC C by 2028’ consultation for privately rented homes.

“There is no question that onsite renewable provision is acknowledged as an open goal in terms of opportunity for the industry. Owner and occupier collaboration is on the increase, but again, surely we need more legislative weight, for example mandatory photovoltaic panels on larger commercial buildings, as well as more attractive fiscal incentives? Plus of course, there is a notable limiting factor: grid capacity. Plenty of progress is surely needed here to realise the full potential.

“The committee’s chair Lord Deben has said that one of the government’s biggest failures was not putting net zero at the heart of the UK’s planning system. He will, no doubt, approve of the recent initiative from the UK Green Building Council, which organised for 100-plus companies, including Landsec, Grosvenor Property and Rockwool, to sign an open letter urging prime minister Rishi Sunak to make planning decisions take account of climate change by law.

“With the tide of green regulation turning the screws on the current building stock, it’s a natural next step to boost sustainability standards of new development from conception.”

This letter was originally published on 13 July 2023 by Property Week and can be read here (behind their paywall).

A man is smiling directly at the camera, wearing a grey suit and light blue shirt, with a plain background.
Author

Edward Glass

View profile

Enforcing net zero targets – Louise Irvine writes for EG

A row of modern townhouses features large glass doors and brick façades. The buildings have balconies above the ground floor, and the symmetrical design is set in a suburban environment.

In the final article of a three-part series on ESG and sustainability, Senior Knowledge Development Lawyer, Louise Irvine, has written for Estates Gazette on the rise of sustainable leases and the challenges around enforcement.

Irvine writes how a recent report by JLL and the BPF identified access to data – particularly on energy consumption – as a major challenge in implementing these leases, with the BPF also recommending a mandate for data sharing between landlords and occupiers. “Without accurate and timely data sharing, it will become increasingly difficult for both landlords and tenants to track against their own and industry-wide sustainability targets.”

She explains that it is difficult to enforce provisions that serve to encourage more sustainable behaviour, rather than obligate them. Even where there is an obligation for the tenant, the landlord is unlikely to forfeit a lease for such a breach. It may also be difficult for a landlord to demonstrate loss arising from breach of a green lease clause.

This is where, Irvine emphasises, collaboration between landlord and tenant is crucial.

“It has historically been more challenging to introduce green lease provisions on a lease renewal under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954. However, this was considered last year in Clipper Logistics plc v Scottish Equitable plc (unreported, Sheffield County Court, 7 March 2022) where it was held that requirements on the tenant to preserve the existing EPC rating of the property were reasonable modernisation and could be included in a renewal lease.

“As green lease provisions become increasingly common, we are slowly shifting towards an institutionally acceptable sustainable lease. The new 8th edition City of London Law Society Certificate of Title, published in May 2023, includes a statement that tenants will not carry out alterations which adversely affect the EPC rating for the property, and that landlords and tenants will share data relating to the environmental performance of the property. These are small but promising steps towards lenders expecting sustainable lease provisions.

“The Financial Conduct Authority is making moves to investigate and tackle greenwashing, which will inevitably mean that contractual arrangements start to be more scrutinised. Green leases will need to be backed up by demonstrable steps or activity to avoid regulatory enforcement for greenwashing going forward.”

The role of regulation

Irvine explains that “as part of the government’s net zero push, there will be a major overhaul of the non-domestic Part L of the Building Regulations in 2025. In the interim, the Minimum Energy Efficiency Standard is the primary driver for change.” The goal is to achieve an EPC rating of B by 2030 and, while this may be unrealistic, it has certainly proved a catalyst in prompting action.

While we have not seen much enforcement of MEES breaches so far, it will be interesting to see if there is a rise in penalties for landlords letting below the requisite EPC rating. Irvine argues that the reputational damage incurred by sub-standard EPC ratings may do more to drive change.

“The government’s Roadmap to Sustainable Investing, published in October 2021, proposed introducing sustainability disclosure requirements into UK legislation to encourage firms (including pension funds, asset managers and investment companies) to accurately report on their ESG data and policies, and this could help to drive change.

“The Law Society has issued guidance to lawyers covering the transition to net zero, and how climate change risks may be relevant to client advice. There are already searches covering climate change risk, which raises the question of the extent to which property lawyers are required to analyse and report on this to clients, or whether this should remain strictly within the remit of surveyors and the client’s own ESG team.”

Future steps

The BPF also advocates greater collaboration between businesses and the government. To catalyse progress, landlords must learn from each other and support a system of greater transparency. “The government response refers to supporting businesses to provide “consistent and comparable data”, which has been welcomed by landlords.

“The Better Building Partnership launched its green lease toolkit back in 2013 and is expected to update its model lease clauses and guidance later this year. Lawyers are also working collaboratively through the Chancery Lane Project, a movement of legal professionals dedicated to using contracts to fight climate change and examine net zero clauses. These go beyond what we are typically seeing in the market and will help to drive the argument for significant drafting changes to meet more ambitious sustainability targets in the future.”

To find out more about Forsters’ ESG & Sustainability credentials, please click here.

Click here to read the first article and second article in our three-part series.

This article was originally published by EG on 16 May 2023 and is available here (behind their paywall).

A woman with curly hair smiles, wearing a black top and necklace, set against a softly blurred, neutral background.
Author

Louise Irvine

View profile

Working together towards net zero – Laura Haworth and Louise Irvine write for EG

A row of modern townhouses features large glass doors and brick façades. The buildings have balconies above the ground floor, and the symmetrical design is set in a suburban environment.

In the second article of a three-part series on ESG and sustainability, Commercial Real Estate Senior Associate, Laura Haworth, and Senior Knowledge Development Lawyer, Louise Irvine, have written for Estates Gazette on how landlords and tenants should collaborate on improving energy efficiency and reducing carbon emissions.

With the government target to achieve nationwide net zero by 2050, the real estate industry is subject to increasing scrutiny to reduce its emissions within this timeframe, if not sooner.

The key point on this is deciding where the responsibility lies and who will pay for the transition. “The industry is coming to realise that the burden is shared, and that only through collaboration can the sector, as a whole, shift forwards and deliver results.”

Sharing data

Irvine and Haworth explain that: “a key opportunity for landlords and tenants, across both the commercial and residential sectors, is to boost data sharing, a crucial factor in meeting net zero goals.”

By doing so, landlords will be more able to understand their tenants’ energy demands and both parties will be better informed as to possible improvements.

The evolution of green leases

“On 1 April 2023, new requirements came into force for all let commercial properties to have an EPC rating of E or above, otherwise those property owners face fines pursuant to the Minimum Energy Efficiency Standard Regulations. But this is the tip of the iceberg in terms of green lease drafting.”

There is a trend towards “dark green” lease clauses, which include provisions such as the sharing of information regarding energy use and waste management, landlord rights of entry to carry out energy efficiency works and more general provisions for the landlord and tenant to co-operate with each other to improve energy efficiency. An implication of this is that tenants “may be required to avoid using gas and for both landlord and tenant to procure their energy supplies from renewable energy providers.

“These green clauses are generally seen by landlords as a back-up. It is preferable that there is an ongoing open dialogue between landlords and their tenants, with a shared objective to move closer to net zero. The provisions in the lease are something to point to if a tenant becomes obstructive.”

Irvine and Haworth write that collaboration is key in making green clauses work since landlords are unlikely to forfeit a lease if a tenant has not provided data on their energy usage. While in the past tenants have often struck out green clauses in leases, today we are seeing much more of an acceptance as many tenants also need to demonstrate their own green credentials as well.

Fit-out for the future

Irvine and Haworth explain that landlords tend to fit-out a space to a basic level, with subsequent occupiers then altering the space in order to it make work for them.

“While there is generally a requirement for the parties to use, where possible, materials that have been recycled and/or are recyclable, often with an obligation to carry out the works with a view to achieving the landlord’s net zero target, parties are now increasingly realising the environmental impact of these frequent re-fits. There is a focus in the industry towards reducing the environmental impact of changing occupiers. There are calls for more flexible spaces so that minimal works are required for each change of use.

“If possible, it is useful to get the tenant involved as early as possible and to work together so that there is only one joint fit-out. However, this involves significant trust between the parties and a willingness to compromise to meet the needs of both.

“Another option is for landlords to retain much greater control over tenants’ works than they perhaps have done previously. Rather than just approving drawings and letting the tenant get on with it, landlords will need to ensure that the actual works meet all of the environmental targets promised in the design stage.”

Tech longevity

“There is a focus on investment in net zero technologies, so it is expected that we will see quite a rapid development of smart tech to assist with energy efficiency. Landlords might find that fairly new systems they have installed become outdated quite quickly. The key is going to be ensuring that individual elements of smart systems can be updated without a total overhaul. This will mean making sure that systems do not use specialist cabling or that the chosen system is not limited by only a handful of people being able to do works to it.

“By working collaboratively, landlords and tenants can move towards a cleaner and greener future. But a willingness to be open and transparent is essential to decarbonising our built environment and reducing operational energy. It is in the interests of both landlord and tenants.”

To find out more about Forsters’ ESG & Sustainability credentials, please click here.

To read the first article in this three-part series, click here.

This article was originally published by EG on 16 May 2023 and is available here (behind their paywall).

Net zero and the push for a greener tomorrow – Laura Haworth and Louise Irvine write for EG

A row of modern townhouses features large glass doors and brick façades. The buildings have balconies above the ground floor, and the symmetrical design is set in a suburban environment.

In the first article of a three-part series on ESG and sustainability, Commercial Real Estate Senior Associate, Laura Haworth, and Senior Knowledge Development Lawyer, Louise Irvine, have contributed a piece to Estates Gazette about the UK’s pathway to reach net zero by 2050.

On 31 March, the government released three documents intended to lay out the UK’s plan to achieve this: the Green Finance Strategy, the Net Zero Growth Plan and the Energy Security Plan. These were released collectively under the government banner of “Green Day” announcements.

Haworth and Irvine write of how, “for those in real estate, the challenge is that there were scant measures that addressed the sector directly, yet at the same time, a large proportion of the measures will have an indirect impact and will need to be considered.”

Despite this, they do say that the announcements clearly outline the government’s overall strategy centring around a “pro-growth regulatory regime”, with examples including “carbon border taxes” and plans to upgrade the UK’s power grid.

Green Day provisions for real estate

The “Great British insulation scheme” is one of the few policy references to real estate, albeit focused on domestic buildings only. It involves middle-income households being offered grants worth hundreds of pounds to make their homes more energy efficient.

A common criticism of this scheme is that while the UK Green Building Council say 27m homes need retrofitting, this initiative will only cover 300,000 households. Moreover, there is no such scheme for commercial real estate.

As expected, the government is also focusing on transitioning to low-carbon heating systems such as heat pumps. For social and low-income homes, the aim is to improve energy efficiency through the extension of the Energy Company Obligation levy.

“While this is a positive move, it does not address energy inefficiency, a fundamental issue that must be rectified across domestic and commercial real estate if the industry is to meet net zero.”

How can landlords fill in the blanks?

Since Green Day, real estate trade bodies like the British Property Federation, the BPF and CBRE say that a much greater level of detail is needed from government in terms of a net zero transition strategy.

Haworth and Irvine believe that landlords are already under considerable pressure to demonstrate how they are tackling the fight towards net zero. “There are factors beyond looming regulatory pressures, such as reputational risk and the idea that there will increasingly be a premium on green spaces. Landlords want to attract the best tenants so they need to ensure that what they are offering is both what tenants want and competitive against other offerings. It is also important to bear in mind that tenants will have their own environmental targets, which will affect their real estate requirements.

“Competition is playing out in terms of compliance with the growing number of accreditations that landlords can seek for their buildings. These not only improve reputation but also help to attract tenants.”

The retrofit revolution

Retrofitting, which carries the dual benefit of helping to decarbonise the sector while also enabling landlords to think more creatively in terms of sustainability and design, is gaining popularity.

Haworth and Irvine comment: “The trend is moving away from the white box spaces that have been popular for so long and towards spaces with more character and in which sustainable measures are very visible. It is a chance to showcase and to create flexible spaces that do not require a complete re-fit every time there is a change of occupier.”

In order to keep pace with the trend’s growing momentum, there is a need for a larger workforce to carry out the improvements to building stock as currently there are few that specialise. The government talks of securing supply chains for the transition, but only time will tell if that extends to the types of skills required for retrofitting and whether it translates into government investment for skills training or if that is left largely to private funding.

How should it be funded?

The Green Finance Strategy indicates that financial markets are planned as a key driver in funding this climate action. “Once again, the real estate sector is in a prime position to benefit from more money going into green projects through dedicated green funds or green loans.”

While the Green Finance Strategy does not, as many had hoped, contain a finalised green taxonomy, it does include a renewed commitment for the UK to be the “best place in the world for raising transition capital”.

“Although there has been an increase in sustainability-linked lending (a loan where the pricing is tied to the borrower’s achievement of sustainability performance objectives as an incentive), and green loans (where the loan proceeds are used for green projects), these are not as commonplace as might be expected, and do not usually offer a real financial incentive to landowners.”

Haworth and Irvine believe that lenders will increasingly focus on the green credentials of buildings and interrogate this more closely as part of their due diligence.

“The question then is – should landlords or tenants pay for the works? There is no one size fits all. The good news is that payback periods for measures such as solar panels are getting shorter. This means tenants are more likely to contribute if they are going to get a full return on their investment during the term of their lease. But, largely, the cost will fall to landlords, and landlords will pay in order to attract the best tenants and achieve the best rents.”

A way to go

Haworth and Irvine conclude by writing: “While there is still a long way to go, the property sector has proven itself to be committed to net zero, as confirmed by a recent joint survey by the BPF and JLL. The government’s Green Day drive has been welcomed for the partial direction that it gives but, as has been the case to date, it will be the pioneers within the sector that drive the initiative and the innovation needed. The good news is there is a growing bank of evidence that green commercial buildings are attracting higher rents, which is expected to act as an incentive, alongside government policies and regulatory requirements.”

To find out more about Forsters’ ESG & Sustainability credentials, please click here.

This article was originally published by EG on 9 May 2023 and is available here (behind their paywall).

Cutting to the chase on the revised Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards regime

A row of modern townhouses features large glass doors and brick façades. The buildings have balconies above the ground floor, and the symmetrical design is set in a suburban environment.

Returning to the familiar ground of sustainability in commercial real estate, podcast host Miri Stickland chats with Senior Associate Ed Glass and Senior Knowledge Development Lawyer Louise Irvine about forthcoming energy efficiency regulatory changes taking effect on 1 April 2023.

We discuss the impact of the changes to the Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards (MEES) regime, the key issues landlords, buyers and sellers need to be aware of to avoid acting unlawfully and how landlords can best future-proof their leases.

In this episode we were joined by:

Listen to more episodes and subscribe

You can listen to more episodes of the More Than Law podcast here on our website, as well as subscribe on your favourite podcast services, including SoundCloud, iTunes/Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Stitcher.

To continue the conversation on social media, use #MoreThanLawPodcast.

A man is smiling directly at the camera, wearing a grey suit and light blue shirt, with a plain background.
Author

Edward Glass

View profile

Property sector’s net zero 2050 target ‘will be missed’ – Edward Glass speaks to Property Week

A row of modern townhouses features large glass doors and brick façades. The buildings have balconies above the ground floor, and the symmetrical design is set in a suburban environment.

Commercial Real Estate Senior Associate, Edward Glass, has contributed to Property Week’s latest commentary on how the majority of senior property industry leaders believe the government will fail to deliver a net zero property sector by 2050.

The British Property Foundation’s (BPF) new report, published in collaboration with JLL, has predicted that “existing net zero carbon policy is not sufficient to achieve the 2050 target.”

The report identifies the primary challenges blocking the industry’s decarbonisation progress, urging government to provide “clear long-term policies”, while a lack of clear financial incentive to support retrofitting was hindering net zero commitments.

Property owners and occupiers surveyed by the BPF also rated poor access to quality data as a major barrier, and the industry body has called on Whitehall to set out new data sharing policies, including mandating data sharing of energy consumption between property owners and occupiers of large commercial buildings.

Edward commented that it was time for government to “give the industry the regulatory certainty it craves.”

He pointed at government consultations on MEES thresholds and a first mandatory performance-based energy rating system which, despite years having passed, have still not progressed.

“Quite rightly, the BPF are calling this out”, he added.

This article was first published in Property Week on 23 February 2023 and is available to read in full here, behind their paywall.

A man is smiling directly at the camera, wearing a grey suit and light blue shirt, with a plain background.
Author

Edward Glass

View profile

An appetite for Electric Vehicle Charging Points

A row of modern townhouses features large glass doors and brick façades. The buildings have balconies above the ground floor, and the symmetrical design is set in a suburban environment.

Chris Armstrong of McDonald’s Restaurants and Commercial Real Estate partner Vicki Towers join podcast host Miri Stickland to talk through Chris’s experiences managing the roll out of rapid EVCPs across McDonald’s UK drive-through restaurant portfolio.

In this episode we were joined by:

Listen to more episodes and subscribe

You can listen to more episodes of the More Than Law podcast here on our website, as well as subscribe on your favourite podcast services, including SoundCloud, iTunes/Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Stitcher.

To continue the conversation on social media, use #MoreThanLawPodcast.

Victoria Towers
Author

Victoria Towers

View profile

Fusion energy: bottling a star

Skyscrapers rise into a cloudy night sky, their windows glowing with interior lights. Nearby buildings reflect on the glass surface, creating an urban atmosphere.

This episode of the More Than Law Podcast was recorded at the UK Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) headquarters with Dr Alexander Pearce, the modelling lead in the UKAEA Power Plant Technology Group, and senior associate Laura Haworth. Alex and Laura joined podcast host Robert Linden Laird Craig to talk about fusion energy; what it is and how it might one day be used to put power on the grid.

You can take a look at the MASCOT robots at UKAEA playing Jenga here.

For an insight into how humans thousands of years from now will be warned against uncovering nuclear waste, you can visit this Wikipedia page.

In this episode we were joined by:

Listen to more episodes and subscribe

You can listen to more episodes of the More Than Law podcast here on our website, as well as subscribe on your favourite podcast services, including SoundCloud, iTunes/Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Stitcher, TuneIn and YouTube.

To continue the conversation on social media, use #MoreThanLawPodcast.

A woman with straight brown hair smiles while wearing a textured light-coloured jacket, set against a plain white background.
Author

Laura Haworth

View profile

Space Junk: the new frontier for sustainability?

Vertical garden flourishing on a building facade, with lush green plants covering multiple levels, set against a backdrop of tall glass skyscrapers.

Dr Hannah Wakeford, lecturer in Astrophysics in the School of Physics at the University of Bristol, and senior associate Laura Haworth join podcast host Miri Stickland to talk about the issue of space junk in Earth’s increasingly crowded orbit, its potential impact on planetary environments and shared lessons for sustainability in space and in our built environment.

In this episode we were joined by:

Listen to more episodes and subscribe

You can listen to more episodes of the More Than Law podcast here on our website, as well as subscribe on your favourite podcast services, including SoundCloud, iTunes/Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Stitcher, TuneIn and YouTube.

To continue the conversation on social media, use #MoreThanLawPodcast.

Powering the UK: Balancing National and Local Agendas – Victoria Du Croz writes for EG

Blueprint displaying a detailed architectural floor plan, showcasing rooms, corridors, and spiral staircases. Grids and lines indicate measurements and sections. Text includes numbers and labels like "SALON."

In the second article in a three-part series on energy supply, Head of Planning, Victoria Du Croz, discusses national targets, local planning and the importance of biodiversity net gain.

The government’s plan to increase the UK’s energy self-sufficiency is urgently needed, but it doesn’t account for the inherent conflict between national policymaking and local political pressures.

At the local level there is already significant competing demand for land, whether for the delivery of much-needed housing, logistics, social infrastructure or national infrastructure. Now added into the mix is the top-down strategy to move away from a reliance on fossil fuels, increase clean energy sources and decarbonise the economy, resulting in a push for renewable energy projects.

April’s Energy Security Strategy adds urgency to existing energy policy. It was preceded in December 2020 by the government’s energy white paper, Powering our Net Zero Future, which built in turn on existing policy commitments set out in the Ten-Point Plan for a Green Industrial Revolution and the National Infrastructure Strategy. Those documents set out the government’s vision of how the UK would make the transition to net zero by 2050.

While the cost-of-living crisis and increased scrutiny on gas supplies from Russia may have shifted the dial slightly in terms of local sentiment towards energy projects, there is a long way to go to deliver the wind farms, solar farms and supporting infrastructure to make the UK self-sufficient and net zero.

The government’s decision in early June to permit new drilling in Surrey to establish the size of a natural gas field highlights the tensions between local and national sentiment, with Surrey County Council having blocked the project twice in recent years. It also highlights the increasing conflict at national level as the government grapples with decarbonisation at the same time as trying to alleviate cost pressures for consumers amid Russia’s war in Ukraine.

National need and local lobbying

Local decision-making and consultation are a vital part of the planning system. However, there is an inherent tension when the government insists on developments securing local support, while also pushing the delivery of key infrastructure that benefits the wider population.

In response to significant local opposition to onshore wind farms back in the 2010s, the government issued a written ministerial statement in 2015 preventing local planning authorities from granting planning permission for onshore wind farms unless the site was allocated as such in the development plan and local support could be demonstrated.

At the same time, the government also amended the Planning Act 2008 so that applications for onshore wind farms are determined under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 rather than under the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Planning regime, owing to communities complaining that they felt excluded under the latter regime.

While this effectively killed off the delivery of onshore wind farms in some areas, in other parts of the country this tension has played out by local opposition being overruled and planning permission ultimately being granted. In the Scottish Highlands – albeit under a different consenting regime – local decisions to refuse wind farm applications have been overturned 40 times in the past five years, while secretary of state for business, energy and industrial strategy Kwasi Kwarteng has gone against recommendations from the Planning Inspectorate by granting planning permission for the multi-billion-pound Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm.

A Politico poll from earlier this year indicated 72% of people would support new wind farms in their area, but query whether that support included residents located adjacent to such projects.

In the British Energy Security Strategy, the government states it will not amend the current planning regulations for onshore wind, in all likelihood meaning the 2015 written ministerial statement will remain in place. Instead, it will look to develop local partnerships for a limited number of “supportive communities who wish to host new onshore wind infrastructure”, with the incentive for the community of guaranteed lower energy bills. Given the current cost of living crisis, it will be interesting to see if such incentives mean there is competition to be one of the identified communities.

While the tide may be turning a little, objection from local communities is not going to blow over anytime soon.

Biodiversity net gain

Renewable energy, conservation and the environment have historically had a conflicted relationship. Often the sites that are seen as suitable locations for wind turbines and solar panels are those that are also species-rich. There have been cases of endangered birds being affected by wind turbine blades, as well as the ground intrusion and disturbance of building solar and wind installations.

In June 2022, there was a parliamentary debate on the location of solar farms owing to growing concern with them being constructed on greenfield sites. In response to the debate, the government confirmed it will consult on amending planning rules in England to strengthen policy in favour of solar development on non-protected land. However, given the reduction the cost of generating solar energy and the government’s commitment to a fivefold increase in solar energy generation, it is widely accepted that a considerable number (potentially 50%) of solar farms will need to be located on greenfield sites.

In the Environment Act 2021, the government introduced a biodiversity net gain target of 10% as a condition on all new planning applications. It can be considerably harder to deliver this level of net gain on solar developments located on greenfield sites, which are likely to have a higher starting level of biodiversity than brownfield sites.

In addition to the 10% uplift, there is an ongoing 30-year maintenance requirement for the biodiversity, which can be difficult to achieve in often densely packed solar farms. The ability for other developments to deliver biodiversity net gain off-site is likely to further increase competition for sites.

The case for cross-boundary co-operation

Who takes on responsibility for ensuring that sufficient energy projects are brought forward? Will local authorities be prepared to allocate sites for renewable energy projects? Where is the strategic direction to ensure that new wind farms and solar farms are being delivered in the numbers that are required?

The numbers are significant. To meet the government’s ambition for all energy to be from “clean sources” by 2035, offshore and onshore wind capacity would need to quadruple and double respectively. It is highly likely that some areas of the country will need to deliver most of the solar and wind farms the country needs. Wind and solar farms require significant space to generate the level of electricity the UK needs to meet its net zero targets, but sites that are deemed suitable often come up against other land designations, such as preservation of the green belt in the National Planning Policy Framework or areas of outstanding natural beauty.

The current duty to co-operate on local planning authorities when plan-making is set to be abolished through the Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill, and there is a lack of clarity on how it will be replaced to ensure cross-boundary co-operation between local authorities.

Some in the industry have been calling for the return of the controversial regional spatial strategies, revoked in 2010, which aimed to bridge the gap between local planning issues determined by local planning policies and nationally determined policy aspirations.

The Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill introduces “national development management policies”, which essentially aim to take “general” development control policies out of local plans, with these set centrally instead. These national development management policies – expected to include green belt designation and heritage protection – will be given the same weight in decision-making as development plans.

Currently, planning applications under the 1990 Act regime are determined in accordance with the development plan unless material circumstances indicate otherwise. The Bill is proposing to strengthen this so that material circumstances must strongly indicate otherwise before applications can be granted if they depart from the development plan – and, in future, national development management policies. It will be interesting to see whether the nation’s energy security and net zero ambitions will be sufficient material circumstances to support sites not allocated in the development plan.

The resourcing challenge

It is widely recognised that planning departments are severely under-resourced. The government’s latest initiative to increase planning fees, unveiled as part of the Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill, is being billed as one way to help address this. But an uplift in application fees is by no means a panacea for the challenges that local authorities’ planning teams are grappling with owing to funding cuts over the years, including low staff numbers and a huge volume of work. A quick job search highlights the issues, with hundreds of vacancies listed for planning officers at local authorities.

Yet the government has signalled that planning will be sped up for solar, and both on- and offshore wind. Which specific mechanisms will be used to bring forward more sites and achieve quicker determination of planning applications remains to be seen. The government could place an obligation on local planning authorities to allocate sites, but that would need to happen within the local plan process and sites could take years to work their way through the plan-making system, especially given the necessary transition provisions before the Bill’s proposed amendments to development plans.

The wind is definitely blowing in the direction of renewable energy generation, but there is a long way to go before the UK is running on clean sources.

This article was originally published in EG (27 June 2022) and is also available to read here behind their paywall.

Victoria Du Croz
Author

Victoria Du Croz

View profile

Should SDLT go “green”?

A row of modern townhouses features large glass doors and brick façades. The buildings have balconies above the ground floor, and the symmetrical design is set in a suburban environment.

With rising energy costs and challenging net zero targets, could Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) be a useful tool to help Britain take the next steps towards more energy efficient homes?

We believe that SDLT, as well as Welsh Land Transaction Tax and Scottish Land and Buildings Tax, could be used to assist taxpayers to achieve a greener, more energy efficient future.

Between 2007 and 2012, full relief from SDLT was available on the purchase (for £500,000 or less) of newly constructed properties which met specified standards of energy efficiency, whilst purchasers buying dwellings for more than £500,000 obtained a £15,000 relief from their SDLT liability. To obtain this relief, the seller had to provide a certificate that had been issued by an assessor to demonstrate that the home qualified.

A decade later and SDLT has only increased in complexity and cost, with added surcharges around second home ownership and non-resident purchasers, as well as reliefs targeted at first time buyers and others. Indeed, nowadays the tax on residential properties can be as high as 17%.

Although adding a further relief to an already complicated set of rules may seem counterproductive (especially for busy conveyancers who are not supported by a wealth of tax lawyers), successive governments have been willing to use SDLT to nudge behaviour in certain directions and the changes made have had significant impact on purchasers’ actions. For evidence of this, we only have to cast our minds back a couple of years when SDLT reliefs put in place during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an overall increase in transactions, with properties in the price bands that benefitted the most from the increase in the nil rate threshold (such as properties above £500,000) receiving a significant proportion of the upturn. It is not difficult to envisage purchasers turning their focus to a property’s energy efficiency if there is a significant tax saving (for example, on their SDLT bill) to be made.

With ambitious targets for Britain’s reduction in carbon emissions, the Government could look to the reinstatement and beefing up of this “green” SDLT relief. One option would be to tie the level of relief to the Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) ratings which are required to be produced before a property can be marketed for sale, with more energy efficient properties benefitting from a greater relief. Expanding such a relief to all dwellings (not just new builds), would incentivise property owners to invest in improving their property’s energy efficiency; sellers would then be able to market their low carbon properties as more affordable or share in the SDLT savings with the purchaser.

We are not alone in thinking that this could be an effective way forward. The UKGBC made a similar suggestion in their 2021 report with a plan to make the change revenue neutral by also adding SDLT increases to homes with low energy efficiency.

Coupled with other targeted assistance the Government provides for improving energy efficiency, this could be an effective way of encouraging homeowners to take the often-expensive steps to improve the energy efficiency of their homes; surely an appealing prospect on both an environmental and cost of living level?

Disclaimer

This note reflects the law as at 23 August 2022. The circumstances of each case vary and this note should not be relied upon in place of specific legal advice.

A man with glasses smiles broadly, wearing a suit and tie, seated against a blurred indoor backdrop with vertical lines.
Author

Oliver Claridge

View profile

Powering the UK: Renewables, Peaks and Troughs, and the Retrofit Revolution – Victoria Du Croz, Polly Montoneri (née Reeve) and Laura Haworth write for EG

Vertical garden flourishing on a building facade, with lush green plants covering multiple levels, set against a backdrop of tall glass skyscrapers.

Head of Planning, Victoria Du Croz, along with Commercial Real Estate Senior Associate, Laura Haworth, and Private Client Counsel, Polly Montoneri (née Reeve), recently collaborated on a piece for EG about the complexities of maintaining (and eventual upgrading) of the UK’s energy supply.

The UK’s energy supply is headline news on a daily basis. The climate crisis, coupled with a cost-of-living crisis and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, has put energy cost and energy creation under ever closer scrutiny. While the UK has moved away from coal-generated power over the past 40 years, it continues to rely on oil and gas for a considerable amount of energy creation. Our households are largely run on gas boilers. According to EDF, around 78% of the energy used to heat our buildings comes from gas and, while the government has brought in legislation to ban gas boilers by 2025, this will only apply to new homes. Even our national grid relies on burning gas to generate power and this is likely to continue in the short-to-medium term.

The UK has historically imported a portion of its gas needs from across the sea through several interconnectors that run from the British coast to France, the Netherlands and Ireland. In eight of the past 10 years, the UK has been a net importer of gas, but so far in 2022 the UK has been a net exporter to Europe as our European neighbours look to replace Russian supply.

The challenge is how the UK weans itself off its reliance on gas, meets its net-zero targets and becomes more self-sufficient in the long term, while remaining environmentally sustainable and improving biodiversity.

Renew the call for renewables

Over the past 30 years the percentage of energy generated via renewable sources – wind, solar and tidal – has increased, accounting for 43% of electricity generation in 2020 and making it the main source of the UK’s electricity over the year. While the statistics in 2020 were promising, the UK generated 14% less electricity from wind in 2021. This is a core issue with wind power generation – the amount that will be generated at any time is hard to predict, and our fallback is gas and nuclear. Prime minister Boris Johnson has asserted that all of the UK’s energy will be from “clean sources” by 2035. To meet this goal, offshore and onshore wind capacity would need to quadruple and double respectively.

A similar story stands for solar; the unpredictability of UK weather means energy supply from solar fluctuates year to year. It is, however, growing, with a combination of commercial and residential rooftop and ground mounts accounting for 4-5% of UK energy supply.

The reality is that 2035 isn’t that many years away and, while the government talks a lot about its green agenda, securing a grid connection and planning consent is hard. Even for the successful minority, moving from proposal to working wind farm takes years, not months.

The big question is: how do we go from renewable sources supporting a small percentage of the UK’s energy creation to 100%? There are several significant challenges to overcome to meet net-zero targets and deliver clean energy. The obvious answer is to build more solar farms and more wind farms, but this is no easy feat and, over a series of three articles, we will be exploring tensions within the planning system, conflicts between local and national policymaking, environmental sustainability and the challenging decisions for landowners.

Peaks and troughs

One of the fundamental challenges with increasing our reliance on renewable energy sources is peaks and troughs in supply. How do we capture surplus energy and store it for the future when the sun isn’t shining and the wind has stopped blowing?

In order to ensure sufficient year-round supply, the UK needs to massively increase its ability to store energy. Battery storage is essential to enabling increased reliance on renewable energy and will be pivotal in facilitating a transition to green energy. Whereas currently fossil fuels are used as back-up to provide a reliable, steady supply of energy, this will no longer be possible due to net-zero targets.

While it has been anticipated that battery storage systems could save the UK energy system £40bn by 2050, ultimately reducing energy bills, battery storage facilities can be contentious. During the planning process, resident groups and the local community object to battery facilities for myriad reasons, including wildlife concerns, visual impact and the requirement for supporting infrastructure.

Permission for battery storage used to be granted through the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project process, but now permission can be granted under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. While this makes it slightly easier (and quicker) to navigate, it increases the potential to come up against local opposition.

Another common concern associated with battery storage is safety. As the number of battery storage facilities increase, driven by demand for solutions to deal with intermittent energy creation from renewables, fires have broken out across the world. In addition, these batteries have a limited lifespan and the production of them (and processing of them once they have come to the end of their useful lives) will have its own environmental impact. The lithium used in these batteries is, after all, a finite resource and the technology involved in producing batteries for different purposes is still developing.

The other safety concern is disposal, due to the potential for leaks and contamination – if the chemical contents escape from battery casements this can cause damage to the local environment. While there may be concerns about potential liability for contamination under the Environmental Protection Act 1990, action taken by local authorities under this legislation is relatively rare. By far a greater risk is a claim for private and/or public nuisance by neighbouring landowners due to migrating contamination. The damage can be widespread (especially if nearby waterways are affected), expensive to remedy and can also be a criminal offence. Contamination could also affect the landowner’s use of their own remaining land.

Building storage facilities raises the issue of competing pressure on finite land. Locally, communities want new (normally affordable) homes, while nationally there is a drive for renewable energy creation. This tension is something we will explore in more detail over the coming weeks.

Upgrade the grid

The other challenge is the capacity of the national grid. The grid requires significant upgrades and improved infrastructure to cater to the additional demand that will be placed on it due to our move to increased electricity use – especially in rural areas. It also needs to be adapted to cater for the peaks and troughs associated with renewable energy, the required storage and the new ways that electricity will move though the grid.

Electric vehicles are a clear example of increasing our reliance on electricity. As we transition to EVs, the supporting infrastructure is vital; it is anticipated that, unless the national grid is strengthened, the charging needs from millions of new EVs could result in blackouts across the country.

Retrofit revolution

Moving towards a reality where all of the UK’s energy is provided by renewable sources is laudable, and necessary to meet net-zero targets. However, generating clean energy can only take us so far if the commercial and residential buildings using this energy are wasting it through buildings that are not energy efficient.

Eighty percent of the buildings that exist now will be in place in 2050 when the UK has committed to be net zero. To ensure our commercial buildings and housing stock are operating efficiently it requires a retrofit revolution, but the onus has been placed on consumers and landlords. In many cases, the cost to the private sector is not proportionate to the energy efficiency improvements that are achievable. Some incentives have been offered to encourage upgrades, including zero rating certain energy saving materials in domestic buildings, but this incentive is time bound and will only go so far given it isn’t applicable to commercial buildings.

Currently, legislation prohibits the new letting of buildings with an F or G energy performance certificate rating (including renewals of existing tenancies) unless an exemption applies. The continued letting of residential property is also prohibited if such property has an EPC rating below an E. From 1 April 2023, landlords will also no longer be able to continue to let commercial properties with an EPC rating below an E. Proposed legislation was put forward in a 2020 white paper to change the minimum standard for commercial property to a C rating in 2027 and a B rating in 2030. The suitability of the EPC rating system is a topic for another day, but the proposed legislation highlights the impression that a lot of work needs to be done to get the UK’s current building stock up to scratch.

Around 500,000 buildings in England are protected by statutory listing, while hundreds of thousands more are in conservation areas. Without changing the policy guidance to enable energy efficient upgrades to be made more easily to these buildings, it is an incredibly costly and drawn-out process.

This is the issue; policy is inconsistent and inconsistently applied. This means that, while net-zero ambitions are to be commended, we have a long way to go before they are a reality.

This article was originally published in EG (21 June 2022) and is also available to read here behind their paywall.

Victoria Du Croz
Author

Victoria Du Croz

View profile

Climate rules increase pressure to rethink leases – Victoria Towers and Louise Irvine speak to PlaceTech

Skyscrapers rise into a cloudy night sky, their windows glowing with interior lights. Nearby buildings reflect on the glass surface, creating an urban atmosphere.

Commercial Real Estate Partner and Co-Head of Logistics, Victoria Towers, and Commercial Real Estate Senior Knowledge Development Lawyer, Louise Irvine, speak to PlaceTech about how the move to make climate reporting mandatory will obligate landlords to include data sharing clauses in future leases.

Since April 2022, the UK’s largest companies and financial institutions have had to disclose their emissions, ensuring they are in line with TCFD recommendations and, as part of the disclosure, report not only their own emissions but those of their value chain. For real estate, that includes tenants’ emissions.

As such, leases will need to evolve to enable data sharing and, as Towers explains, while we are seeing numerous developers take greater interest in the ‘green’ provisions in their leases, the challenge is including clauses that tenants are happy to agree to.

Irvine goes on to explain that in recognition of the incoming requirement to disclose emission data, landlords and tenants are discussing provisions around the energy providers tenants can use – pushing them towards a greener option.

Irvine comments: “I think [it’s] all very much being driven by knowing that they’re going to have to disclose and work towards targets quite quickly.”

You can read the article in full here, on the PlaceTech website.

Victoria Towers is a Partner in the Commercial Real Estate team and leads Forsters client facing ESG offering. Louise Irvine is a Senior Knowledge Development Lawyer in the Commercial Real Estate team.

A woman with curly hair smiles, wearing a black top and necklace, set against a softly blurred, neutral background.
Author

Louise Irvine

View profile

Nine-month warning: Are you ready for looming climate rules?

Skyscrapers rise into a cloudy night sky, their windows glowing with interior lights. Nearby buildings reflect on the glass surface, creating an urban atmosphere.

Commercial Real Estate Senior Associate, Edward Glass, speaks to PlaceTech about what exactly landlords need to know about Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards (MEES) and how they can prepare for the April 2023 “crunch point” as a ban on continuing to let commercial buildings with poor energy ratings comes into effect.

Current MEES regulations prevent landlord from granting new leases for commercial real estate (CRE) spaces with an EPC rating below E. Next April, however, this ban will extend to existing leases (and by 2030, the ban is expected to extend to all properties with an EPC rating of below B; currently thought to be 85% of the UK’s CRE space).

Exemptions aside, there will be penalties for non-compliance – monetary and reputational – which inevitably has landlords worried.

As this “crunch point” approaches, and legislative thresholds are set to ramp up, Glass’s key advice for landlords is a must read.

You can read the article in full here, on the PlaceTech website.

Ed is a Senior Associate in the Commercial Real Estate team, with a specialism in ESG matters.

A man is smiling directly at the camera, wearing a grey suit and light blue shirt, with a plain background.
Author

Edward Glass

View profile

“The challenge of your career” – our takeaways from the BPF Annual Conference 2022

Vertical garden flourishing on a building facade, with lush green plants covering multiple levels, set against a backdrop of tall glass skyscrapers.

We had a fantastic morning at the BPF Annual Conference on 15 June 2022. It was the first since the coronavirus pandemic and there was only one topic on the agenda – the path to achieving Net Zero.

The conference included keynote speakers from industry, government, and policy as well as shining a light on the perspective of the next generation of leaders in property via the involvement of BPF Futures.

As the property industry finds itself centre stage in the challenge of a generation, Chris Stark from the UK Climate Change Committee (UKCCC) noted the difficulties of the real estate sector for climate change. He proposed, however, that the difficult bit is actually the most exciting part of the journey.

Here’s our key takeaways from the day.

We’ve been here before – and it’s damaging your real estate portfolio

Global temperatures have been at their current level before, millions of years ago. At that time the sea level was 20 metres higher than it is now. This really highlights the danger that we face if we fail to take action now. The heatwave experienced by the UK in 2018 was used as an example of impact on UK real estate. It resulted in subsidence claims costing £64 million. This is an issue for us, right now, and the UK hazards caused by climate change are only forecast to increase as the global temperature increases (sorry).

Sustainability is in your financial interest

It’s not all doom and gloom. With the cost of gas skyrocketing at the moment, it is cheaper to use renewable electricity than fossil fuels. There are also economic benefits to retrofitting buildings; sustainable assets generally have a higher rental value at a price premium. The Bank of England and Lloyds Bank both commented that there are a lot of investors wanting to inject cash into green real estate, leading to more discounted lending as the green lending market grows. Whilst it is estimated that £50-60bn capital investment per year is needed to meet the 2050 Net Zero target, it is expected that with returns from savings on expensive fossil fuels the overall cost will be close to zero. The UK has some of the “leakiest” buildings in Europe so there is also big saving potential from insulating.

Sustainability is important for talent retention

Perhaps one of the biggest takeaways from the day was the expectation that younger generations have for their employers in terms of progressing towards Net Zero by 2050. BPF Futures members consider sustainability issues a critical factor when considering workplace options. They have clear expectations of the property industry to end greenwashing and produce tangible strategies towards achieving Net Zero. Putting in place innovative ESG strategies (social as well as environmental) is key. If a company cannot innovate to solve this problem, junior colleagues feel that they cannot add value in an organisation that is simply doing things the way they have always done them.

Greenwashing is holding us back

Chris Stark (UKCCC) advised the industry to minimise the use of offsets, as it is more important to focus on reducing actual emissions even if that means you won’t quite hit Net Zero. What matters more, is pushing along the national strategy towards reaching that goal. It is his view that de-carbonising buildings is the big story for the next 20 years, and the challenge of our careers.

Sarah Breeden from the Bank of England also highlighted the risks to the economy associated with greenwashing. She said that there is a wall of capital wanting to invest in green, however, with no clear pathway to Net Zero, investors are finding it hard to identify genuine opportunities.

Doing something now is more important than being perfect

This was another of the key messages from the day. One of the greatest challenges for sustainability at the moment is the difficulties in measuring our progress; however time is running out to have a meaningful impact. Sarah Breeden (Bank of England) said that, when making disclosures on sustainability, it is better to be roughly right “now” than precisely right when it is too late. Catherine Sherwin of BlackRock phrased this as trying to make better choices, even if they cannot be measured in their entirety.

We need to get better at sharing data and ideas

This is not a new challenge for the property industry, but with an estimated 90% of investment in sustainability needing to come from the private sector, the quicker we can learn the better. One of the key challenges in funding de-carbonisation is obtaining tenant data relating to carbon. In the absence of legislation mandating the sharing of data as can be found in countries like France, we need “radical collaboration” (to borrow COP’s slogan).

At the conference the BPF launched its Net Zero pledge for members, which aims to enable businesses of all sizes to engage with this issue practically and strategically. The overarching theme was one of collaboration: we need to work together to tackle this global problem.

Whilst the UK is on track to reach Net Zero by 2050, not all of the rest of the world is. In fact, global emissions are still rising. The UK needs to set an example of working together.

We need to prioritise areas of greater impact

Large scale renewable generation is well on its way and so we need to focus on being ready to switch to electricity as a priority, rather than installing a couple of solar panels on houses which will not make a fundamental difference in the long term. To be ready to switch over from gas heating in 2030, action needs to be taken now: training installers, testing hydrogen (and coming up with another solution if that doesn’t work!), preparing the grid and installing district heating networks.

Yael Selfin of KPMG flagged that whilst only a mild recession next year is anticipated, there is a concern that there will be a drop in investment (including in skills training) in 2023 which could hamper our ability to prepare for switching to renewables. The following graph shows the number of jobs needed in this area to help us reach this important goal.

Workforce Requirements Graph

Image source: UKCCC

The private sector has a heavy role to play

As aforementioned, the vast majority of investment in sustainability will need to come from the private sector. The regulators are aware of their role in this challenge, with the FCA reportedly putting out proposals in July to engage with the need for regulation to help investors differentiate between real green investment and greenwashing. In politics, whilst there is a cross party consensus that sustainability is an issue, there remains a debate over the change of pace.

Retrofitting is crucial to reduce embodied carbon and upgrade the UK’s existing building stock. There is a view that the incentives for demolition (such as works on new builds being zero-rated for VAT) need to be removed and for the planning system to be overhauled to enable developers to focus on retrofitting, but in the meantime, there have been calls for the industry to consider what it can do on an asset by asset basis. The idea of cross investment was also floated – using profits from switching to renewable energy to assist with the cost of retrofitting. To reach the target set for de-carbonisation we need to repurpose 3% of building stock every year for 25 years; we are currently only managing 1%.

Laura Haworth is a Senior Associate in the Commercial Real Estate team with a keen interest in ESG matters and renewable energy. Lauren Melachrino is an Associate in the Commercial Real Estate team and a BPF Futures member.

Forsters are a member of the BPF and currently sit on the BPF’s Planning, Build to Rent and VAT committees.